Plain-language answers from your own project history, cited

Twenty years of jobs. Ask them a question.

Revelry makes your project history askable.

No credit card required.

What is already sitting in your systems

Your history is already an asset. It is just not askable.

Accessing decades of history shouldn't require asking a senior staff member.

What did we buy the electrical scope for on the last two medical office jobs. Which subs' contracts grew the most after award. How did we handle that soils condition on the site off Airline. Which owner's rep holds retention past substantial completion.

Somebody in your office knows all four. He is not looking it up when you ask, he is remembering it, and he is usually right. That works until it does not, which is the week he leaves, or the week he is on a jobsite and the bid is due at two.

The data itself is not missing. Bid history is in BuildingConnected. Contracts, commitments, and change orders are in Procore. RFIs and submittals are there too, but only for jobs after you implemented it, and everything before that is in whatever folder structure somebody set up in 2014. If that structure lives in SharePoint or OneDrive we read it where it sits. If it lives on a file server in the office, it gets uploaded. Nothing is lost either way. It is just not reachable in the fifteen minutes you have.

Revelry reads across all of it and answers the question you actually asked, with every answer pointing back to the contract, the bid, or the document it came from.

The number most GCs never look at

Procore holds what you contracted a sub for and every change order written against it since. That means the gap between buyout and final contract value is sitting in your history right now, job by job, sub by sub, and almost nobody queries it.

That gap is a pattern. Some subs bid tight and hold. Some bid light and make it up in change orders, and they do it consistently enough that it shows across four jobs. You are getting one of those subs on a bid tab next month, and today the only person who can warn you is the PM who lived it.

Ask which trades generate the most contract growth on your work. Ask whose contracts grew most after award over the last three years. The answers are already there.

Where the record ends

Revelry reads your project systems, which means contract value, not cost. It knows what you agreed to pay a sub and what the change orders did to that number. It does not know what the job actually cost you, because that lives in accounting. If a question needs actuals, the answer will say what it can see and what it cannot rather than inferring cost from contract value.

On the people who know things

Look at who in your office knows how you bid hospital work, which owner's reps hold retention past substantial completion, and where the closeout files from 2019 live. It is a short list, and most of the people on it have been there a long time. That is not a coincidence. It is what institutional knowledge is.

Now count how many of them are within five years of retiring.

This is not a staffing problem you can hire your way out of, because what leaves with them is not a role. It is thirty years of pattern recognition and the knowledge of where things are.

Nothing captures judgment, and this does not claim to. What it captures is the trail around the judgment: the records, the sources, and the answers that let the next person get to a decision without starting from zero. The time to make your history askable is while the people who built it are still there to correct it.

Ask it something only your best PM would know.

Upload a slice of your real project history and ask it yourself.

No credit card required.