Right-of-way and land services.
AI built for right-of-way.
From the first title run to the last damage release, we built AI for the whole line.
We built it for the work that buries a project office: running chain of title on two hundred tracts, building Thursday's status report, and getting a promise made at a kitchen table to the crew that clears the right-of-way. Every answer cites its source.
SOC 2 Type 1 compliant
Independently audited. Report available under NDA.
Built by Revelry.co
Ten years shipping software before we built AI agents.
No AI hype
We will tell you what this cannot do.
Easy AI
Working from the files you already keep.
Reads the rest of your stack
Land management system exports · Spreadsheets · Easement and lease forms · Contact logs
Revelry Ai reads exports from your land management system, plus your spreadsheets and forms, and does the document work around them. The setup comes with it, built to your forms, your report templates, and your client's requirements.
Solving your most common needs
Title review
Chain of title, read once.
Instruments abstracted into your runsheet, each entry cited to book and page. Curative items flagged before anyone sets a closing date.
Learn moreAcquisition reporting
Thursday's report, built from this week's data.
Line list, survey permission, title, and acquisition status pulled from the system your agents already update. Stalled tracts show up while there is still time to work them.
Learn moreLandowner commitments
Every promise, carried to the crew.
Gates, timber, crop damage, and access windows pulled from contact logs and executed easements, tied to the tract and station, and handed to construction in one list.
Learn moreData trust and control
Every answer, checkable.
Every entry traceable to the instrument or log line it came from. Access is scoped by project and audit-logged. Confidential routes stay confidential.
Learn moreRight-of-way lifecycle solutions
Ownership, prior easements, and landowner history on every parcel along a proposed route. For a solar or wind site, which option agreements expire before interconnection does.
Instruments abstracted into your format, ownership and encumbrances cited to book and page, and curative items listed per tract with the instrument that raised them.
Every survey permission request, denial, and condition tracked by tract, so the survey crew's schedule matches who actually said yes.
Contact logs structured as agents write them. Offers, counteroffers, and every landowner request held on the tract, ready for the special provisions.
The full negotiation history on a tract assembled for counsel. Every contact and offer cited to its log entry, in the order counsel asks for.
Construction conditions built from every commitment on every tract, so the gate goes where the agent said it would. Weekly status for the client while crews work.
Damage releases, restoration sign-offs, and recorded easements matched against the tract list, so the file your client keeps for the life of the line is complete.
The honest comparison
You have four options.
| Dimension | Add agents | Consumer AI tools | Build it in-house | Revelry Ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost | Day rate and per diem for the life of the project | Cheap, and blind to your files | Your developers' time, every year | Priced in writing after the first call |
| Time to value | As fast as you can staff the spread | Immediate and shallow | Months, on top of the roadmap you already have | First workflow in weeks |
| Knows your projects | Eventually | No. Zero every session | Yes, if you fund it | Your forms, your tract files, your history |
| Consistent output | Varies by agent | Every user improvises | Whatever you scoped | Built once, runs the same every time |
| Touches your systems | By typing | No | Built in | Your exports, your documents, and your forms |
| Traceable | As good as the agent's notes | No citations | Depends | Every entry cited to its source |
| Who approves | Them | You, prompt by prompt | Your team | Your team. Permission-scoped, audit-logged |
| Data exposure | Internal | Shared tenants | Internal | SOC 2 Type 1. Your landowner data never trains a model |
Schedule a demo.
Thirty minutes. Bring a tract file, a stack of instruments, or the status report that eats your PM's Wednesday. We run it live against your documents and you see the citations.
What's on your AI wish list?
Tell us what you want to see. If it isn't worth automating yet, we will say so.
Questions your team will ask
No. It takes the retyping and the searching. The landowner relationship, the negotiation, and the call on a tract stay with your people.
No. Revelry Ai reads what your system produces and works on the documents around it. Your system stays the record, and your GIS team keeps the map.
ChatGPT has never seen your forms or your tract files, and everyone on the team prompts it differently. Revelry Ai is set up on your forms during onboarding and runs the same Workflow every time.
Every entry cites the instrument, page, or log line it came from. Revelry Ai produces documents and answers, and your systems stay the record. Nothing gets written back to a connected system without someone approving that specific write, and every decision is logged.
SOC 2 Type 1. Your data never trains a model, ours or anyone else's. Access is scoped by project, so a team sees the projects it works. We will name every LLM provider in the stack.
One workflow, proven, before we touch anything else. You'll see it on the demo call.
We put the number in writing after the first call.